Worx 163 Vs 170: Ultimate 2026 Trimmer Comparison

As an Amazon Associate, I earn from qualifying purchases.

Both trim well. WG163 is lighter and cheaper; WG170 adds true 3‑in‑1 versatility.

Saturday morning yard work taught me a lot about the Worx 163 Vs 170. Both tamed my edges fast, but they shine in different ways. The WG163 is nimble and simple. The WG170 is a 3‑in‑1 trimmer, edger, and mini mower. I tested both on my walkway, fence line, and rough patches. Below, I share what actually matters so you can pick the right fit in the Worx 163 Vs 170 debate.

Is Worx WG163 Good?

Yes—for most small to mid yards, the WG163 is a smart buy. It is light, easy to set up, and cuts clean lines. If you want a no-fuss trimmer that also edges well, this one hits the mark. It runs on the Worx 20V PowerShare system, so you can swap batteries with other tools. It is also usually the best price in the Worx 163 Vs 170 matchup.

On my first run, I edged 60 feet of sidewalk without hand strain. The single guide wheel kept the line straight. Later, I trimmed around raised beds and a chain-link fence. The pivoting head helped me reach under low shrubs. The WG163 feels like a friendly tool you grab without thinking, which is why I keep it by the garage door.

Worx WG163 GT 3.0 20V PowerShare 12″ Cordless String Trimmer & Edger (Battery & Charger Included) and WA0047 4-Pack String Trimmer Replacement Line, Orange

Worx 163 Vs 170



What Makes It Stand Out / Key Features

  • 20V PowerShare battery platform; swap with other Worx tools
  • 12-inch cutting swath with 0.065″ line
  • Command Feed push-button line advance
  • 90° tilting head and telescopic shaft
  • Edger mode with a guide wheel and plant/flower guard

What I Like

  • Lightweight and well-balanced; low arm fatigue
  • Fast switch from trimming to edging
  • Clean, straight edges thanks to the wheel
  • Command Feed saves time; no bumping
  • Great value in the Worx 163 Vs 170 choice if you do basic yard care

What Could Be Better

  • Not ideal for heavy, knee-high weeds
  • Single wheel in edge mode is stable, but less so than WG170’s dual wheel setup
  • No true mini-mower mode like the WG170

My Recommendation

Pick the WG163 if you want simple, light, and budget-friendly power for weekly trim and edge work. It is the easy pick in Worx 163 Vs 170 for small yards.

Best ForWhy
Small to mid lawnsLight, quick, and easy to store
Budget buyersLower price with strong basics
Simple edgingGuide wheel gives straight lines

Is Worx WG170 Good?

Yes—if you want more control and modes, the WG170 is worth it. It is a 3‑in‑1: trimmer, wheeled edger, and a mini mower. The extra wheels add stability and make long edges easy. It also has more handle and head adjustments. In the Worx 163 Vs 170 face-off, this is the “do more” pick.

I used the WG170 on a sloped strip by my driveway. The dual wheels let me edge in a straight line without wobble. Then I flipped to mini mower mode for a narrow side yard where my full mower is clumsy. It handled patchy grass and uneven spots better than I expected. It is a touch heavier than the WG163, but the wheels carry the load.

Worx String Trimmer/Edger/Lawn Mower 3-in-1 Grass Trimmer GT Revolution 20V 12″ (2 Batteries & Charger Included) WG170

Worx 163 Vs 170



What Makes It Stand Out / Key Features

  • 3‑in‑1 design: trimmer, edger, and mini mower
  • Dual support wheels for steadier edging and mowing
  • Multiple handle and head positions for fine fit
  • 12-inch cutting swath with Command Feed
  • 20V PowerShare battery platform compatibility

What I Like

  • Mini mower mode is a real win for tight strips
  • Very stable, straight edges with dual wheels
  • More ergonomic adjustments for different users
  • Strong cut on thicker, taller grass than the WG163
  • Best overall versatility in the Worx 163 Vs 170 match-up

What Could Be Better

  • Costs more than WG163
  • A bit heavier; wheels help but carrying it upstairs is tougher
  • Mini mower mode still has a trimmer line, not a blade

My Recommendation

Choose the WG170 if you want the most options and the steadiest edges, and do more than basic trimming.

Best ForWhy
Mixed, tricky yardsMini mower mode and dual wheels add control
Users who edge a lotStraighter, faster edging along long runs
Shared toolsMore adjustments fit different heights

Worx 163 Vs 170: Side-by-Side Test

I ran both tools back-to-back around my walkways, beds, and a narrow strip. Here is how the Worx 163 Vs 170 stack up on the things you will notice most.

Power & Cut Quality: Which Slices Cleaner?

Both run on 20V and a 12″ swath. I looked at how they handle thick grass and edges.

Spec/ResultWorx WG163Worx WG170
Voltage20V Max20V Max
Cutting swath12 inches12 inches
Tall grass handlingGood for moderate growthBetter; less bog in thick spots
Edge crispnessStraight and cleanVery straight; dual wheels help

Rating: WG163 – 8.5/10 | WG170 – 9/10
> WG170 takes a slight edge for thicker grass and the steadiest lines.

Versatility & Modes: Who Does More?

I checked how each tool adapts to more than trimming.

FeatureWorx WG163Worx WG170
Trim modeYesYes
Edger modeYes, single guide wheelYes, dual-wheel support
Mini mower modeNoYes
Head/handle adjustmentsGoodMore positions

Rating: WG163 – 8/10 | WG170 – 9.5/10
> WG170 wins the Worx 163 Vs 170 versatility test with its true 3‑in‑1 design.

Ergonomics & Control: Which Feels Better?

Comfort matters. I rated balance, grip, and control over long runs.

AspectWorx WG163Worx WG170
Weight feelLighter and nimbleSlightly heavier
Wheel supportSingle wheel for edgingDual wheels for edging/mowing
AdjustabilityTelescopic shaft, tilt headMore ergonomic positions
Fatigue over timeVery lowLow; wheels offset weight

Rating: WG163 – 9/10 | WG170 – 9/10
> Tie. WG163 is lighter; WG170’s wheels and adjustments balance the extra weight.

Battery Life & Charging: How Long Can You Work?

I measured practical runtime and swap ease using 2.0Ah packs.

MetricWorx WG163Worx WG170
Runtime per 2.0AhAbout 20–25 mins light useAbout 18–23 mins (more load in mower mode)
Batteries includedOften 2 (varies by kit)Often 2 (varies by kit)
Platform20V PowerShare20V PowerShare
Swap speedQuickQuick

Rating: WG163 – 9/10 | WG170 – 8.5/10
> WG163 lasts a bit longer since WG170’s extra modes can draw more power.

Line Feed & Maintenance: What’s Easier?

Both use 0.065″ line and Command Feed. I checked spool use and upkeep.

ItemWorx WG163Worx WG170
Line advanceCommand Feed buttonCommand Feed button
Spool typeWA0010 (0.065″)WA0010 (0.065″)
Free spools programEligible (pay S&H)Eligible (pay S&H)
Head accessSimpleSimple

Rating: WG163 – 9/10 | WG170 – 9/10
> Tie. In the Worx 163 Vs 170 maintenance check, both are equally simple.

Price & Value: Which Is the Smarter Buy?

Cost versus capability is key for the Worx 163 Vs 170 pick.

FactorWorx WG163Worx WG170
Typical priceLowerHigher
Included extrasBasics; sometimes extra spoolsMore adjustments, dual wheels
Capability per dollarGreat for basic needsGreat for multi-mode needs
Overall valueBest budget pickBest versatility pick

Rating: WG163 – 9.5/10 | WG170 – 9/10
> WG163 offers top value if you do not need mini mower mode.

Final Verdict: Which Should You Buy?

For most small to mid lawns, pick the WG163. It is light, simple, and budget-friendly. In the Worx 163 Vs 170 choice, it nails weekly trimming and clean edges with less effort and cost.

If you need more control or deal with tight strips, slopes, or long edges, the WG170 wins. Its 3‑in‑1 setup and dual wheels bring real gains. In short: WG163 for simple speed; WG170 for maximum versatility.

FAQs Of Worx 163 Vs 170

What is the main difference in the Worx 163 Vs 170?

WG163 is a 2‑in‑1 trimmer/edger. WG170 adds a true mini mower mode and dual wheels for steadier edging and mowing.

Which is better for small yards in the Worx 163 Vs 170?

WG163. It is lighter, cheaper, and perfect for weekly trims and edges on small to mid lawns.

Is the WG170 worth the extra cost?

Yes if you edge a lot, work on slopes, or want the mini mower mode. If you only trim and edge a bit, the WG163 is the smarter spend.

Do WG163 and WG170 use the same batteries and spools?

Yes. Both use Worx 20V PowerShare batteries and 0.065″ WA0010 spools with Command Feed.

Which gives straighter edges in the Worx 163 Vs 170?

WG170. The dual wheels give better tracking on long, straight runs, though WG163 is still very good.

Share

Leave a Comment